Library / Aviation

Cedar Reach North Vertiport

A hybrid heliport / vertiport at a 30% schematic level. A small model carrying very dense delivery data — which is the right shape for a 30% package, and a useful counterweight to the generated samples.

Elements54

Data rows149across 15 tables

Issued sheets5

Size0.09 MB

Download .mass Executive report

What it does that the generated samples do not

TLOF, FATO, safety areas and downwash zones modelled as IfcSpace, with design-basis parameters in Pset_Vertiport* — so the geometry that matters in aviation is queryable rather than drawn
Five issued aviation sheets covering geometry and marking, approach/departure and obstacles, operational safety, and lighting and controls
An approvals register keyed to real regulatory instruments — airspace notice, layout plan amendment, security design approval
A design basis that names its own biggest gap first: no design aircraft has been selected, and the report states plainly that TLOF/FATO geometry, deck loads, charger power, downwash and half the budget all derive from that choice

Issued drawings

AV1.01_Aviation_Overall_Plan.svg — **AV1.01** Aviation Overall Planopen full ↗

AV1.02_Aviation_Geometry_and_Marking_Plan.svg — **AV1.02** Aviation Geometry and Marking Planopen full ↗

AV1.03_Approach_Departure_and_Obstacle_Plan.svg — **AV1.03** Approach Departure and Obstacle Planopen full ↗

AV1.05_Operational_Safety_Plan.svg — **AV1.05** Operational Safety Planopen full ↗

E2.01_Aviation_Lighting_and_Controls_Plan.svg — **E2.01** Aviation Lighting and Controls Planopen full ↗

Provenance

This package was authored separately and contributed to the library. It arrived named for a real airport, in a real city, in an archive named for a real eVTOL manufacturer. Everything here is dedicated to the public domain and carries a hard rule that no sample names a real place or party, so the identity was replaced by tools/rebrand_vertiport.py.

Was	Is
A real airport name	Cedar Reach North Vertiport
A real city and state	Cedar Reach, State
A real aircraft manufacturer	Sample Aircraft
A real state plane coordinate zone	NAD83 Sample Grid

Nothing else changed. The regulatory references, geometry formulas, design basis, registers, budget, schedule and sheets are exactly as contributed. The rebrand is recorded inside the container under manifest.rebranded.

Two things were added, because the container lacked them: a geometry/model.frag converted from the source IFC it already contained (without it the sample opens to an empty canvas), and a rebuilt manifest inventory — substituting text changed byte lengths, so the entry sizes it shipped no longer described its own contents.

Read the report before citing anything. It opens by stating what the package is not: not sealed engineering, no number validated by a licensed professional or any authority having jurisdiction, every dimension flagged UNVERIFIED deliberately. A 30% package that does not say it is 30% is how a schematic sketch ends up quoted as a clearance.